A scientific approach to getting good at things and becoming an expert
From the creator of the 10,000 hour rule: But not strictly true
Hours spent is the key determining factor but in the right way
Hours spent doing the wrong type of practise get worse/don't improve
Doctors who believe their skills are good enough already
Wrong practise? No feedback, no comparison, no guidance on right or wrong - aimlessly putting in the reps = bad.
How to get good?
Demonstrated with an experiment Ericsson and Pool ran on recalling numbers with Steve.
He did this by using the 4 components of purposeful practise.
Purposeful practise